2009/4/17 Lenny Marks <le...@aps.org>

> I've been doing something similar. I think the benefit of having half the
> steps(each can be negated) wins over the small impact it has on step
> readability. Personally I started adding stuff like this(perhaps not as DRY
> but simple enough):
> Then /^the correspondence should (not )?have inclusions$/ do |negate|
>   if negate
>     @outcorr.inclusions.should be_empty
>   else
>     @outcorr.inclusions.should_not be_empty
>   end
> end
>

Thanks Lenny. You get it. Readability trumps obsessive DRYness.
Corollary: The value of DRYness diminishes with distance.


> -lenny
>
> On Apr 16, 2009, at 12:03 PM, Joaquin Rivera Padron wrote:
>
> wow! even shorter :-)
>
> 2009/4/16 Matt Wynne <m...@mattwynne.net>
>
>>
>> On 16 Apr 2009, at 14:06, Joaquin Rivera Padron wrote:
>>
>>  thanks matt,
>>> yes, the regexp in the step matcher is a good one to dry it up
>>>
>>> So I end up with this one:
>>>
>>> Then /^I (should|should not) see the people search form$/ do |maybe|
>>>  people_search_form_should_exist maybe == "should"
>>> end
>>>
>>> and the method:
>>>
>>> def people_search_form_should_exist it_should_exist
>>>  _not = "_not" unless it_should_exist
>>>
>>>  response.send "should#{_not}".to_sym, have_tag('form#frmSearch')
>>> end
>>>
>>> only because I find it easier to read (when I don't need to jump to the
>>> method), but yours maybe faster (shorter it is), I could come back to it
>>> later and benchmark both
>>>
>>
>> If you don't mind using the #send (I was trying to help you get rid of it)
>> then just do this:
>>
>> Then /^I (should|should not) see the people search form$/ do |maybe|
>>  response.send maybe.underscore.to_sym, have_tag('form#frmSearch')
>> end
>>
>>
>>  thanks again,
>>> joaquin
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rspec-users mailing list
>>> rspec-users@rubyforge.org
>>> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
>>>
>>
>> Matt Wynne
>> http://blog.mattwynne.net
>> http://www.songkick.com
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rspec-users mailing list
>> rspec-users@rubyforge.org
>> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
>>
>
>
>
> --
> www.least-significant-bit.com
> _______________________________________________
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-users@rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-users@rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
>
_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users

Reply via email to