On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 7:14 AM, doug livesey <biot...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi -- I have an expectation that looks like this: > > it "should display a field for the username" do > do_render > response.should have_selector( "form" ) do |form| > form.should have_selector( "input", :name => "username" ) > end > end > > > That gives me this error: > > 'session/new.html.haml should display a field for the username' FAILED > expected following output to contain a <input name='username'/> tag: > <form action="/session" id="login" method="post"> > <p> > <label for="username"> > Username > </label> > <input id="username" name="username" type="text"></p> > <p> > <label for="password"> > Password > </label> > <input id="password" name="password" type="password"></p> > <input name="commit" type="submit" value="login"> > </form> > > When I don't try to match inside the form (so just saying "response.should > have_selector( "input" ... )"), it passes fine. > So is have_selector supposed to only match immediate descendants of the > selector in the block definition, or is this a bug ... > ... Or am I being seriously dumb, here? ;)
have_selector is from webrat and there is a separate webrat google group. Might want to try there, or filing a bug report with webrat: http://groups.google.com/group/webrat https://webrat.lighthouseapp.com/ Cheers, David > Cheers, Doug. > > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-users@rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users > _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
