Hey Dan,

1 approach you could do is define a method within the outer describe that is called within the inner describe and within each test not contained by an inner describe.

describe "Some functionality" do
  it "should do something" do
    @variable = some_expensive_operation
    @variable.should do_something
  end

  describe "in a specific context" do
    before(:all) do
      @variable = some_expensive_operation
    end

    it "should do another thing" do
      @variable.should do_another_thing
    end
  end

  def some_expensive_operation
    p "in here"
  end
end

(also uploaded to http://gist.github.com/143693)

My solution is to unDRY the subcontext's preconditions. I have pretty strong opinions about DRYing up specs at the cost of grokability.

On Jul 9, 2009, at 6:40 AM, Daniel Tenner wrote:

Hi all,

Like everyone (?), I use nested contexts to keep my specs well organised and tidy.

However, I have a problem. I have various sets of specs that needs to perform very time-expensive operations to set up the fixtures that will be examined in the tests. Two specific examples: testing access control logic (requires creating a whole tree of items to verify the correct access level against each item), and project archival (which creates a project, fills it with test data, archives/ zips the project contents, then unzips them for examination).

I tried using before(:all) to set up those costly fixtures, however I hit upon a feature of rspec that made that less than successful:

When using before(:all) along with nested contexts, rspec actually re-runs the before(:all) before each sub-context. So if, like me, you have your specs neatly organised in sub-contexts, the before(:all) is actually re-run many times.

Interestingly, when a before(:all) is run in the root context, rspec does not actually remove the data from the database when re-running the before(:all). "Great," I then thought, "I can just detect whether the data is created and decide whether or not to create the objects on that basis". Not so fast, though: Rspec may not clobber the database, but it does clobber instance variables. In the case of the access control test, there's about 40 different instance variables, so keeping track of them all manually in some global variable outside of rspec would be messy to say the least...

So my question is, is there any workaround for successfully using before(:all) and nested specs, so that code like the following works and doesn't run the expensive operation more than once:

describe "Some functionality" do
  before(:all) do
    @variable = some_expensive_operation
  end

  it "should do something" do
    @variable.should do_something
  end

  describe "in a specific context" do
    it "should do another thing" do
      @variable.should do_another_thing
    end
  end
end

Worth noting that I'm quite happy to give up the ability to have before blocks in the sub-contexts in order to ensure that the expensive operation is only run once...

Your thoughts most welcome... (including, perhaps, telling me that I'm Doing It Wrong)

Daniel Tenner
http://www.woobius.com
http://danieltenner.com
_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users

--
Zach Moazeni
http://simplechatter.com



_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users

Reply via email to