It's not a bug. Consider:
"abc".should eql("abc") <= pass
"abc".should_not eql("def") <= pass
But eql() is a Ruby method. In Pickaxe, you'll see that other
comparators such as != >= etc. Are not implemented as overridable
methods.
Hope this clarifies.
Hunted and pecked from my iPhone
On Oct 12, 2009, at 12:11 PM, Bret Pettichord <b...@pettichord.com>
wrote:
Looks like an rspec bug to me.
Bret
Willy Mene wrote:
I've tried searching around for something describing how the
#should method works with the != operator, but couldn't find
anything conclusive. Can someone please explain while the
following lines will pass if placed into an rspec example?
it "should fail but passes" do
[].should != []
'some string'.should != 'some string'
end
Thanks!
Willy
_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
