On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 6:26 PM, Scott Taylor <sc...@railsnewbie.com> wrote: > > On Oct 12, 2009, at 9:14 PM, David Chelimsky wrote: > >> On Oct 12, 2009, at 9:37 PM, Sam Woodard wrote: >> >>> I have an interesting setup: I am using rspec for mocking but I have >>> mocha installed which give me access to any_instance, expects, etc. The >>> problem that I am having is that I want to stub out a method for the >>> duration of a single example, throughout that example but only for that >>> example. >>> >>> If I do, >>> >>> Goal.any_instance.stub!(:valid?).and_return(true) >>> >>> this is not sufficient because valid is called more than once >>> >>> If I do, >>> >>> Goal.any_instance.stubs(:valid?).returns(true) then my tests are not >>> independent but dependent on one another. >>> >>> Can anyone help? >> >> While mocha and rspec's mocks might be compatible for you in some cases, >> it is purely accidental. I'd strongly recommend you choose one or the other. >> If any_instance is important to you, I'd choose mocha. If not, choose >> whichever makes you happier. > > Unless I'm incorrect, this is still a feature request on the lighthouse > tracker. > > I don't see why we couldn't use something like this code: > > http://github.com/smtlaissezfaire/mix_master > > to implement the mixin/mixout feature that we'd need to support different > frameworks per-example group.
David and I began work in an experimental branch that would make any_instance easy without any mixin magic (although admittedly it does do const redefinition magic ;) I should finish that up at some point. Pat _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
