Excelent, Pat.
Is this operator documented somewhere?
Thank you,
Rodrigo.
Em 29-10-2009 00:16, Pat Maddox escreveu:
Already in.
[1,2].should =~ [2,1]
Pat
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 4:44 PM, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas
<lboc...@yahoo.com.br> wrote:
How about having this matcher along the default available matchers?
require 'set'
Spec::Matchers.define :have_same_elements_of do |expected|
match do |actual|
expected.to_set == actual.to_set
end
end
Example:
[1,2].should have_same_elements_of([2,1])
Best Regards,
Rodrigo.
__________________________________________________
Faça ligações para outros computadores com o novo Yahoo! Messenger
http://br.beta.messenger.yahoo.com/
_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
__________________________________________________
Faça ligações para outros computadores com o novo Yahoo! Messenger
http://br.beta.messenger.yahoo.com/
_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
