On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 2:35 AM, Conrad Taylor <conra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> David, I'm still seeing the issue. Thus, here's a transcript of my > activity: > > http://pastie.org/688639 $ gem which fakefs (checking gem bmabey-fakefs-0.1.1.1 for fakefs) /Users/david/.rvm/gems/ruby/1.9.1/gems/bmabey-fakefs-0.1.1.1/lib/fakefs.rb What version of fakefs are you using? > > > -Conrad > > On Nov 4, 2:28 pm, David Chelimsky <dchelim...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 7:25 AM, Conrad Taylor <conra...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Hi, 'rake spec' failed to run on Ruby 1.9.1p243 and RSpec 1.2.9. > > > > Hi Conrad, > > > > If this was a problem in the gem, it is now fixed: > > > > $ rvm 1.9.1 > > $ which ruby > > /Users/david/.rvm/ruby-1.9.1-p243/bin/ruby > > $ rake spec > > ... > > 1522 examples, 0 failures, 2 pending > > > > Cheers, > > David > > > > > > > > > I'm > > > getting the following error message when I run the specs: > > > > > /opt/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/rspec-1.2.9/spec/spec/runner/ > > > option_parser_spec.rb:21:in `block (2 levels) in <top (required)>': > > > wrong number of arguments (0 for 1) (ArgumentError) > > > > > After analyzing the error message, it appears that "use_fakefs" method > > > on lines 21 and 522 of the > > > > > option_parser_spec.rb > > > > > should take an argument. > > > > > -Conrad > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > rspec-users mailing list > > > rspec-us...@rubyforge.org > > >http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users > > > > _______________________________________________ > > rspec-users mailing list > > rspec-us...@rubyforge.orghttp:// > rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-users@rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users >
_______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
