I've been using rspec with webrat, for exactly this sort of thing, as
detailed here: http://blog.veez.us/2009/09/11/integration-testing-without-cucumber
On Apr 27, 2010, at 5:36 AM, Martin DeMello wrote:
I have a series of tests I want to automate, which involve running
shell scripts in a "live" environment (i.e. nothing mocked or
stubbed), and then verifying the state of the system. I thought that,
even though it doesn't fit the classic definition of "testing", RSpec
would still be a handy way to organise the tests. Is it likely to be
useful, or am I going against the grain enough that I'd run into
problems?
martin
_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
