Ok, something else is going on because I just generated a brand new app with rspec-2.0.beta.10 and the transactions are working just fine. Sorry about that, I'll track down the issue.
- Brian On Jun 5, 4:12 pm, Brian Cardarella <bcardare...@gmail.com> wrote: > Sorry, forgot to answer the other question. I am using ActiveRecord. > Just a greenfield Rails 3.0.0.beta3 app > > - Brian > > On Jun 5, 3:42 pm, David Chelimsky <dchelim...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Jun 5, 2010, at 3:34 PM, Brian Cardarella wrote: > > > > On Jun 5, 2:12 pm, David Chelimsky <dchelim...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> On Jun 5, 2010, at 12:42 PM, Brian Cardarella wrote: > > > >>> Subject pretty much asks the question > > > >> You _can_, but if you use ActiveRecord and start off with a clean DB, > > >> you can use_transactional_examples (alias for > > >> use_transactional_fixtures, which defaults to true in beta.10, but will > > >> default to false in beta.11). > > > David, > > > > I'm not seeing that behavior. > > > > I have beta.10 and without using database_cleaner data is persisting > > > after each spec and from suite run to suite run. I thought > > > database_cleaner would resolve the issue but it doesn't seem to. > > > I _am_ seeing that behaviour :) > > > Are you using AR? What does your spec_helper look like? > > > This cucumber feature passes: > > >http://github.com/rspec/rspec-rails/blob/master/features/model_specs/... > > > Not sure what's up, but there is something different about your environment. > > > _______________________________________________ > > rspec-users mailing list > > rspec-us...@rubyforge.orghttp://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users > > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-us...@rubyforge.orghttp://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
