Awesome. Thanks for the clarification!
On Jun 10, 1:10 pm, David Chelimsky <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 3:14 PM, geetarista <[email protected]> wrote: > > Since Rspec-Rails 2 is specifically geared toward Rails 3, I'm > > wondering why it doesn't use railtie, the new generators, etc. Will > > it stay this way or is it planned to support that? > > It does use the new generators, and we do have a railtie, but bundler > doesn't support exposing the railtie in the :test group by default, so > if you do this: > > group :test do > gem "rspec-rails" > end > > ... then you won't see the rake tasks or the generators. I believe > this will be addressed in bundler before it goes final, at which point > we'll rely only on the railtie. > > Cheers, > David > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > [email protected]http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
