Em 19-06-2010 16:12, Rick DeNatale escreveu:
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 1:07 PM, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas
<[email protected]> wrote:
Is there any reason for that? If so, couldn't Rspec use Capybara instead of
Webrat if it is not present? Is it possible to depend on Webrat OR Capybara
in the gem specs?
Gemspecs don't allow alternative dependencies.
I have a similar issue with the RiCal gem. It works with either the
activesupport OR tzinfo gems, rather than require either I just
document that it requires one or the other and leave it up to the
user.
Maybe Rspec should keep depending on Webrat instead for allowing easy
installation until Gemspecs support alternative dependencies. It is not
that bad for those using Capybara and maybe Capybara will merge to
Webrat anyway...
Thank you for your information,
Rodrigo.
__________________________________________________
Fale com seus amigos de graça com o novo Yahoo! Messenger
http://br.messenger.yahoo.com/
_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
