On Jun 28, 2010, at 1:31 PM, Curtis j Schofield wrote: > Hi - I extracted some methods in a refactor and put them into a nice > module and i'm in the process of making sure it is covered as a > first-class unit. > > I'm getting some strange behavior with what seems really straight forward > code. > > https://gist.github.com/6d54448d70b07a126c51
should_receive replaces the method in question, so when you say: @foo.should_receive(:toad_string) the actual toad_string method is never invoked, hence control is not passed on to toad_nokogiri_xml_document. In general, mocking and stubbing methods on the object your testing should be avoided, for exactly this reason. HTH, David _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
