On Jul 30, 2010, at 5:13 AM, Ashley Moran wrote:
> Hi
>
> I finally looked into why this is not currently possibly in RSpec 2 (beta 19):
>
> shared_examples_for "Etymology" do
> describe "The etymology of foo" do
> it "is followed by #{after_foo}" do
> # ...
> end
> end
> end
>
> describe "foo", focus: true do
> it_should_behave_like "Etymology" do
> def self.after_foo
> "bar"
> end
> end
> end
>
> It's because of the current implementation of
> ExampleGroup.define_shared_group_method, which evaluates the shared example
> block before the customisation block:
>
> shared_group = describe("#{report_label} \#{name}", &shared_block)
> shared_group.class_eval(&customization_block) if customization_block
>
> (This is behaviour I found surprising.)
>
> However, with a little more metaprogramming jiggery-pokery, you can have them
> evaluated in the other order:
>
> module RSpec
> module Core
> class ExampleGroup
> # ...
>
> def self.define_shared_group_method(new_name, report_label=nil)
> report_label = "it should behave like" unless report_label
> module_eval(<<-END_RUBY, __FILE__, __LINE__)
> def self.#{new_name}(name, &customization_block)
> shared_block = world.shared_example_groups[name]
> raise "Could not find shared example group named
> \#{name.inspect}" unless shared_block
>
> compound_block = lambda do |*args|
> module_eval &customization_block if customization_block
> module_eval &shared_block
> end
>
> shared_group = describe("#{report_label} \#{name}",
> &compound_block)
> shared_group
> end
> END_RUBY
> end
>
> # ...
> end
> end
> end
>
Or ...
def self.define_shared_group_method(new_name, report_label=nil)
report_label = "it should behave like" unless report_label
module_eval(<<-END_RUBY, __FILE__, __LINE__)
def self.#{new_name}(name, &customization_block)
shared_block = world.shared_example_groups[name]
raise "Could not find shared example group named \#{name.inspect}"
unless shared_block
describe "#{report_label} \#{name}" do
module_eval &customization_block if customization_block
module_eval &shared_block
end
end
END_RUBY
end
> Would this be a useful improvement to RSpec 2?
Yes
> Any opinions on the order of the block evaluation for shared examples
Makes perfect sense to me. Wanna make a patch with an additional scenario in
the cuke?
>
> Cheers
> Ash
>
> --
> http://www.patchspace.co.uk/
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/ashleymoran
>
> _______________________________________________
> rspec-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
