On Aug 04, 2010, at 12:41 pm, David Chelimsky wrote:
> What happens if the shared spec author really wants it to just be a hash? Do
> you think that's a valid use case?
It could get in the way, then, I guess. You'd always have the original hash
parameter if you wanted to use the method, but I guess it could cause trouble
if you did this, or similar:
shared_examples_for "a foo container" do |foo, options = {}|
it "has a #{foo}" do; end
end
describe Bar do
it_should_behave_like "a foo container", 1, foo: 2
end
I'll probably play with this idea in my own code. There's definitely no need
worry about it now, being able to pass arguments to shared example groups is
90% of the win for me.
Cheers
Ash
--
http://www.patchspace.co.uk/
http://www.linkedin.com/in/ashleymoran
_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
