I put in:

$:.unshift(File.dirname(__FILE__) + '/../lib')
require 'reader'

and it still does nothing.

dhf


On Aug 12, 10:13 am, David Chelimsky <dchelim...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Aug 12, 2010, at 3:08 PM, Don French wrote:
>
> > The helper file does not have anything in it as of right now. It had
> > the the old
> >  #begin
> > #  require 'spec'
> > #rescue LoadError
> > #  require 'rubygems' unless Config['NO_RUBYGEMS']
> > #  gem 'rspec'
> > #  require 'spec'
> > #end
> > from rspec 1.3.0
>
> > Now it is empty.
>
> I can't find it, but I could swear there was a bug report about empty spec 
> files causing rspec to not output anything. Try putting some code in there 
> and see what happens.
>
>
>
>
>
> > This project was generated via newgem.
>
> > I want to upgrade to rspec2 and ruby 1.9.2.  Doing it in stages
> > currently 1.9.1.
>
> > Don French
>
> > On Aug 12, 8:21 am, Ashley Moran <ashley.mo...@patchspace.co.uk>
> > wrote:
> >> On 12 Aug 2010, at 08:27, Don French wrote:
>
> >>> under bundler bundle exec autotest  standalone autotest both within
> >>> the project directory and there is a spec subdirectory with the spec
> >>> in them.
>
> >> What happens when you run `rspec spec`?
>
> >> What is in your spec_helper.rb file?
>
> >> What is the output of `find spec`?
>
> >> That's all I can think of asking right now...
>
> >> --http://www.patchspace.co.uk/http://www.linkedin.com/in/ashleymoran
>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> rspec-users mailing list
> >> rspec-us...@rubyforge.orghttp://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
> > _______________________________________________
> > rspec-users mailing list
> > rspec-us...@rubyforge.org
> >http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
>
> _______________________________________________
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-us...@rubyforge.orghttp://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users

Reply via email to