On Oct 5, 2010, at 2:32 AM, Tom Stuart wrote:

> Hi David,
> 
> On 3 Oct 2010, at 23:41, David Chelimsky wrote:
>> These are release candidate gems for updates 1.x series, including some bug 
>> fixes and deprecation warnings for functionality that will be removed in 
>> rspec-2.
> 
> I'm having to maintain a fork of RSpec just so that I can revert the commit 
> which caused the breakage in 
> https://rspec.lighthouseapp.com/projects/5645-rspec/tickets/1009. What are 
> the chances of getting the failing example from that ticket into 1.3.1, along 
> with either a reversion of the offending commit or (much better) an actual 
> fix? To me this is a significant compatibility issue since it used to work in 
> RSpec 1.2.9 and still does work in RSpec 2. I just don't understand enough 
> about how this part of RSpec works to do a proper fix myself, but from a 
> selfish perspective a revert of the bad commit is better than no fix at all.

Hi Tom,

Looks like it does work in rspec-2: 
http://github.com/rspec/rspec-mocks/commit/b8135d5d8d04930f09d606a96c2d84be910a12f2

As for rspec-1, if it were a simple matter of reverting the commit, I'd do it, 
but the revert fails w/ merge errors and I don't have the time to debug that 
right now. So 1.3.1 is going to go out without addressing this unless someone 
else submits a patch.

Wish I could give you better news, but my plate is piled high and there is only 
so much time in a day.

Cheers,
David


_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users

Reply via email to