On Oct 19, 2010, at 4:11 PM, Matthew Van Horn wrote:

> I also ran into this today. Not sure where the "contain" matcher is, looked 
> in rspec-rails and rspec-expectations, but came up empty.
> (Rails 3.0.0 / Rspec 2.0.0)


Webrat and Capybara each have a contain() matcher.

Trick is that Capybara matchers are not available in view specs, so for those 
you've gotta use Webrat (if you want contain()).

> -- matt
> 
> On Oct 18, 2010, at 5:53 PM, Stephen Veit wrote:
> 
>> 
>> On Oct 18, 3:41 pm, David Chelimsky <dchelim...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Oct 18, 2010, at 3:27 PM, Stephen Veit wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Using Rails 2 and rspec-rails 2.0.1.
>>> 
>>> rspec-rails-2 does not support rails-2. Please use rspec-rails-1.3.3 for 
>>> rails-2.
>>> 
>>> HTH,
>>> David
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rspec-users mailing list
>>> rspec-us...@rubyforge.orghttp://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
>> 
>> 
>> I meant to type "Rails 3".
>> 
>> I am using Rails 3 and rspec-rails 2.0.1.
>> _______________________________________________
>> rspec-users mailing list
>> rspec-users@rubyforge.org
>> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-users@rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users

_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users

Reply via email to