On Nov 3, 2010, at 5:39 PM, Rhett Sutphin wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I've converted a couple of my smaller libraries' spec suites to rspec 2 with 
> no trouble.  (I'm enjoying the new version -- thanks to all involved.)  I'm 
> trying to convert one a larger suite now and I've run into two problems on 
> ruby 1.9.1 (but not 1.8.7) related to constant resolution in describes inside 
> of modules.  One of the problems haven't been able to reproduce in a simple 
> test case, but the other one I have.  Here's the reproducible one:
> 
> # ---- baz_spec.rb
> 
> module Foo
>  module Quux
>    class Baz
>      def name
>        "noise"
>      end
>    end
>  end
> end
> 
> module Foo::Quux
>  describe Baz do
>    it "has a name" do
>      Baz.new.name.should == 'noise'
>    end
>  end
> end
> 
> # ----
> 
> This spec passes on rspec 2.0.1 and 1.3.0 on Ruby 1.8.7:
> 
> ----
> $ ruby -v
> ruby 1.8.7 (2010-08-16 patchlevel 302) [i686-darwin10.4.0]
> $ spec _1.3.0_ baz_spec.rb 
> .
> 
> Finished in 0.002011 seconds
> 
> 1 example, 0 failures
> $ rspec _2.0.1_ baz_spec.rb 
> .
> 
> Finished in 0.00077 seconds
> 1 example, 0 failures
> ----
> 
> It also passes on rspec 1.3.0 on Ruby 1.9.1.  On rspec 2.0.1, it fails:
> 
> ----
> $ ruby -v
> ruby 1.9.1p378 (2010-01-10 revision 26273) [i386-darwin10.3.0]
> $ spec _1.3.0_ baz_spec.rb 
> .
> 
> Finished in 0.020187 seconds
> 
> 1 example, 0 failures
> $ rspec _2.0.1_ baz_spec.rb 
> F
> 
> Failures:
>  1) Foo::Quux::Baz has a name
>     Failure/Error: Baz.new.name.should == 'noise'
>     uninitialized constant RSpec::Core::ExampleGroup::Nested_1::Baz
>     # ./baz_spec.rb:14:in `block (2 levels) in <module:Quux>'
> 
> Finished in 0.00159 seconds
> 1 example, 1 failure
> ----
> 
> Is this a bug or expected behavior in rspec 2?  I'll file an issue if it's a 
> bug -- this would be against rspec-core, correct?

Same issue just came up on this list yesterday: 
http://groups.google.com/group/rspec/browse_thread/thread/60cfab923dbf007a
_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users

Reply via email to