On Feb 14, 2011, at 21:53, Kane Baccigalupi <li...@ruby-forum.com> wrote:
> Kane Baccigalupi wrote in post #981670: > >> We can try a global, but it isn't an ideal situation. > > So, we did replace @dom with $dom. That meant we could go back to doing > no manual garbage collection, and in fact we didn't even have to set the > global to nil between test files. > > Doesn't that imply that RSpec 2 is holding on to stuff that could lead > to memory leaks in big tests for other folks too? Clearly. That's why I said "workaround" :) Would you do me a favor and submit an issue to http://github.com/rspec/rspec-core/issues? Thx, David _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
