>From looking at the RSpec Rails documentation
(https://www.relishapp.com/rspec/rspec-rails/docs/view-specs/view-spec) it
seems like rendered is just a string and you can't really do any
assert_select type stuff out of the box.
After Googling around, it seems that the RSpec authors decided that if you
want that functionality, you should just use Capybara or some such... is
that correct?
If that is the case, can you please look at how I'm writing my view specs
and let me know if there is a better/cleaner way?
Here goes...
*spec/spec_helper.rb*
RSpec.configure do |config|
config.include RSpec::ViewHelper, :type => :view
end
*spec/support/view_helper.rb*
module RSpec::ViewHelper
def page
@page ||= Capybara::Node::Simple.new(rendered)
end
end
*spec/views/comments/index.html.haml_spec.rb*
require "spec_helper"
describe "comments/index.html.haml" do
it "should show a proper breadcrumb" do
# Assign instance vars
# Mock helper methods
render
page.should have_selector("div.breadcrumb")
page.find("div.breadcrumb").tap do |node|
node.find_link("Home").should be
node.find_link("Blah1").should be
node.find_link("Blah1").should be
node.find_link("Comments").should be
end
end
end
Is there a better way? Including Capybara just for the finders/matchers
seems kinda heavy. Also it would be nice if I could write stuff like
node.should
have_link("Home"), to be more consistent with RSpec matchers (though I guess
I could write custom matchers to wrap all the Capybara stuff... has anyone
already done this?).
Thanks for the help.
_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
