Indeed it should be :)
Tnx.
Bas
On 27-Jul-2012, at 2:42 PM, Srushti Ambekallu wrote:
> On 27-Jul-2012, at 11:34 AM, Bas Vodde wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> How about:
>>
>> Message.should_receive(:Message.method_a).with(xxx).and_return(true)
>
> I think that ought to be:
> Message.should_receive(:method_a).with(xxx).and_return(true)
>
>>
>> Bas
>>
>> On 27-Jul-2012, at 1:31 PM, bill gate wrote:
>>
>>> Hi, I have two model: Message, User
>>>
>>> message.rb
>>> ```
>>> class Message < ActiveRecord::Base
>>> class << self
>>> def method_a(args)
>>> [1,2]
>>> end
>>> end
>>> end
>>> ```
>>>
>>> user.rb
>>> ```
>>> class User < ActiveRecord::Base
>>> def method_user
>>> if Message.method_a('anythings')
>>> #... some code
>>> end
>>> end
>>> end
>>> ```
>>> I want to test method_user,but I don't want to test Message#method_a
>>> How I can mock Message with method_a?
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> --
>>> Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rspec-users mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rspec-users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
>
> I think the thing people don't usually realise is classes in Ruby are also
> objects in their own right. So, whatever you can do to any other object, you
> can do to a class.
>
> Thanks,
> Srushti
> http://c42.in
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rspec-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
