On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 11:37 PM, Bas Vodde <[email protected]> wrote: > > JB is right. > > Sometimes, for clarity, it is useful to add should_not, but for > functionality it is usually not needed. >
I know JMock has never() for this people. Should RSpec-mocks have something like object.should_receive(:nothing). -- J. B. (Joe) Rainsberger :: http://www.jbrains.ca :: http://blog.thecodewhisperer.com Author, JUnit Recipes Free Your Mind to Do Great Work :: http://www.freeyourmind-dogreatwork.com
_______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
