Thanks, I noticed something wierd in the ecommerce book.
On the model there is first stated : validates :title, :description, :image_url, presence: true which means that the image_url must be filled in . Later is stated : validates :image_url, allow_blank: true, Which means the image_url can be empty. Do I think right ? and wierd minitest is not finding this Roelof Op donderdag 11 december 2014 07:15:16 UTC+1 schreef Myron Marston: > On Tuesday, December 9, 2014 11:15:07 PM UTC-8, Roelof Wobben wrote: >> >> Here my repo : https://github.com/roelof1967/commerce-try >> >> Roelof >> >> Op woensdag 10 december 2014 07:42:47 UTC+1 schreef Roelof Wobben: >> >>> I did also rails g rspec:install otherwise rspec do not give output. >>> >>> Roelof >>> >>> >>> Op woensdag 10 december 2014 00:23:21 UTC+1 schreef Carlos Figueiredo: >>> >>>> Minitest is the default test suite on Rails. >>>> >>>> Did you just installed rspec-rails gem, or did you also run `rails >>>> generate rspec:install` ? >>>> >>>> Because `rails generate rspec:install` configures you env to run rspec. >>>> >>>> Carlos >>>> >>>> On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 7:12 PM, Roelof Wobben <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> I use the rspec rails gem . >>>>> >>>>> I found this in the gem file : >>>>> >>>>> gem "rspec-rails", "~> 2.14.0" >>>>> >>>>> If you want , I can upload this project to my personal github page. >>>>> >>>>> How can I print out the product.errors ? >>>>> >>>>> Roelof >>>>> >>>>> Op dinsdag 9 december 2014 21:53:35 UTC+1 schreef Myron Marston: >>>>> >>>>>> On Tuesday, December 9, 2014 11:05:26 AM UTC-8, Roelof Wobben wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I will cut the error message in two. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> the minitest error message : >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Warning: you should require 'minitest/autorun' instead. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Warning: or add 'gem "minitest"' before 'require " >>>>>>> minitest/autorun"' >>>>>>> >>>>>>> and the Rspec error message : >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Failures: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 1) Product is valid with a productname, description and >>>>>>> a image_url >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Failure/Error: expect(product).to be_valid >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> expected valid? to return true, got false >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> # ./spec/model/product_spec.rb:10:in `block (2 >>>>>>> levels) in <top (required)>' >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Roelof >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> The expectation failure is telling you that `product.valid?` did not >>>>>> return true as expected. It's impossible for us to say what >>>>>> specifically >>>>>> is making it invalid. You'll have to check `product.errors` to see what >>>>>> the validation errors are. It looks like your spec is running without >>>>>> rspec-rails loaded (since `be_valid` isn't providing the errors -- the >>>>>> default `be_valid` matcher in rspec-expectations just checks `valid?` >>>>>> but >>>>>> doesn't know to look for `errors`). If you load `rspec-rails`, an >>>>>> improved >>>>>> `be_valid` matcher is available that will include the validation errors >>>>>> in >>>>>> the failure message: >>>>>> >>>>>> https://github.com/rspec/rspec-rails/blob/v3.1.0/lib/ >>>>>> rspec/rails/matchers/be_valid.rb >>>>>> >>>>>> If you use that, it should pinpoint what the validation error is, and >>>>>> then you can fix it. >>>>>> >>>>>> HTH, >>>>>> Myron >>>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>> Groups "rspec" group. >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>>> an email to [email protected]. >>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rspec/a68be083-ab07-437b-b3ec-4ddb9a978b5d%40googlegroups.com >>>>> >>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rspec/a68be083-ab07-437b-b3ec-4ddb9a978b5d%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>>>> . >>>>> >>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>> >>>> >>>> > OK, I've taken a look at your repository and discovered a few things: > > - The minitest warning is triggered by shoulda-matchers. If you read > the changelog[1], you'll notice that 2.6.0 fixes this, so you should > upgrade. > - You're on an old version of RSpec, too -- please upgrade to RSpec 3 > [2] > - The rspec-rails `be_valid` matcher isn't being used in your case > because your spec file is in the `spec/model` directory, not the > `spec/models` directory. These sorts of subtleties are why we changed > things in RSpec 3 so that spec types aren't auto-inferred by the directory > unless you opt in [3], and I'd encourage you to explicitly tag each spec > with `:type` metadata (e.g. `:type => :model`). > - Once you tag the example group or move the spec file to > `spec/models`, you'll get the validation errors in the failure message and > from there you should be able to address tehm. > > HTH, > Myron > > [1] https://github.com/thoughtbot/shoulda-matchers/blob/master/NEWS.md > [2] http://rspec.github.io/upgrading-from-rspec-2/ > [3] > http://myronmars.to/n/dev-blog/2014/05/notable-changes-in-rspec-3#filetype_inference_disabled_by_default > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "rspec" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rspec/02b26839-d765-4636-a252-851c8a1357a8%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
