You should use 3 if at all possible, the fundamentals are the same. On Tuesday, 23 December 2014, Roelof Wobben <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello, > > Is there a good book which explains rspec 3 or can I better stay at > version 2 at the moment ? > > Roelof > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "rspec" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected] > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','rspec%[email protected]');>. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rspec/52384c52-3740-49d9-be56-ba23b1d2b034%40googlegroups.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rspec/52384c52-3740-49d9-be56-ba23b1d2b034%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "rspec" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rspec/CAEGxe4uMWeL3huXBusp%3D0s736DzuF-PyHqOvD5_U9AguOAU23w%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
