Yes it would be fairly involved. The most seamless way would be to create and run example groups and examples yourself using that custom formatter, then feeding back into the existing run cycle. You can see why this hasn’t been tackled to satisfaction before!
Jon Rowe --------------------------- [email protected] jonrowe.co.uk On 29 June 2019 at 10:44, Wiebe-Marten Wijnja wrote: > Thank you for your response. This seems like quite a big undertaking. Also, > would having a custom formatter mean that it would be impossible for people > to use their own custom formatter? > > I think for now I'll choose the easier (but slightly less satisfying) > approach of having the user specify lifecycle methods in the property itself > explicitly. (And maybe have a custom way to run the same before/after actions > for a whole group of property tests.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "rspec" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rspec/dejalu-217-6b99fef4-cd2e-4ef6-949c-1aa56221f860%40jonrowe.co.uk. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
