Thanks for the info Jon. Do you think it makes more sense to go to RSpec 2.99 before going to RSpec 3.x, or just go straight to 3.x?
> On Apr 11, 2020, at 3:57 AM, Jon Rowe <[email protected]> wrote: > > rspec-rails 3.x does support Rails 3.2, so you could upgrade rspec all the > way first if you choose to. > > You will need rspec-rails 4.0 for Rails 6.0 > > Jon Rowe > --------------------------- > [email protected] > jonrowe.co.uk > > On 10 April 2020 at 23:16, Jack Royal-Gordon wrote: >> Thanks, Joseph. Some I did know but was choosing to ignore (to my peril), >> and some I didn’t know. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "rspec" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rspec/dejalu-217-6659e5dd-559a-4fc8-b470-8e7fe3718d01%40jonrowe.co.uk > > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rspec/dejalu-217-6659e5dd-559a-4fc8-b470-8e7fe3718d01%40jonrowe.co.uk?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "rspec" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rspec/8A6E0593-1AD8-4655-8195-1157A28FEE0F%40pobox.com.
