Jack, Found this message in the spam folder for some reason.
Don't think you'll ever need minitest/autotest if you use RSpec. It's an alternative, rspec-expectations are compatible with it, however, I have never seen minitest+rspec-expectations used together in the wild. As per relish - it's only used internally by the RSpec core team to build and publish docs, so you will not need it. For Cucumber, you're free to use the version you like. We were sticking with >= 2.13, < 3.0 for a while, but have recently relaxed this to < 4.0 after making sure we're 3.0-compatible. What kind of hell is it, can you please be more specific? On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 9:33 PM Jack Royal-Gordon <[email protected]> wrote: > As a follow-up question, where can I find documentation that talks about > the relationship of all these various pieces: > RSpec > Cucumber > Relish > Mini-Test > AutoTest > > I seem to be in some kind of dependency hell or version mismatch as I try > to get RSpec testing working for my Rails 3.2 / Ruby 2.0 application, > preparatory to upgrading Ruby and Rails versions. I think that > understanding the relationship of these pieces is the beginning of solving > my problems. > > On Apr 9, 2020, at 1:00 AM, Jon Rowe <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Phil > > There most certainly is, in addition to the standard `https://rdoc.info` > <https://rdoc.info> docs which all published gems have (e.g > https://rdoc.info/gems/rspec-core for rspec-core) if you go to our site, > https://rspec.info/documentation/ you’ll see links to all of our > documentation, both our RDoc style API documentation and the Relish hosted > “readable” documentation based on our cucumber scenarios. > > To answer your question directly, `scenario` is an alias of `it` or > `example`. It is used in rspec-rails in conjunction with Capybara for > feature tests, see: > https://relishapp.com/rspec/rspec-rails/v/4-0/docs/feature-specs/feature-spec > > Cheers > Jon Rowe > --------------------------- > [email protected] > jonrowe.co.uk > > On 9 April 2020 at 00:38, Phil Goodwin wrote: > > Is there any on-line documentation for Rspec? I assume not because I can't > find it by Google search. Even the Rspec site has a page that talks about > the documentation without actually linking to it. I just want to know > whether "scenario" is a synonym for "context". It seems like this is the > simplest thing. I'm going to feel so dumb when I find out where the > documentation is, but I honestly can't find it. > > Thanks, > > Phil > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "rspec" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rspec/dejalu-217-b3ecd662-ec35-4b52-9db4-c2e157310996%40jonrowe.co.uk > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rspec/dejalu-217-b3ecd662-ec35-4b52-9db4-c2e157310996%40jonrowe.co.uk?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "rspec" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rspec/CCC85122-BB8F-43C4-B33E-20FF76F424D6%40pobox.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rspec/CCC85122-BB8F-43C4-B33E-20FF76F424D6%40pobox.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "rspec" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rspec/CAAk5Ok_KgwGYLg_Q_rKUAN_UQg2%2B5W-TSRZR1cncaY95MtA61A%40mail.gmail.com.
