Hi All,
Is there any gem which generates parallel report in rspec when
executed in parallel? .
The report should be generated file wise
Regards,
Malini.SM
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 12:43 PM Andrew Hodgkinson <[email protected]>
wrote:
> Thought some people might be interested in an open source (MIT licence)
> RSpec formatter we wrote at RIP Global to help us see how far along CI is
> on longer test suites.
>
> https://github.com/ripglobal/doggo
>
> https://rubygems.org/gems/doggo
>
>
> The example test suite for documentation includes various deliberate
> failure cases so you can see how they look. A passing suite is simple:
>
> [ 22] Doggo
>
> [ 22] #message
>
> [01/22] logs directly if an example-start occurs unexpectedly
>
> [02/22] logs directly with no example running
>
> [03/22] logs in context if an example is running
>
> [ 22] example groups
>
> [ 22] #example_group_finished
>
> [04/22] does not decrement below zero
>
> [05/22] derements group level
>
> [ 22] #example_group_started
>
> [06/22] does not output a separator below top level
>
> [07/22] outputs an indication of group progress
> ...etc
>
>
> A failing suite is more verbose, so if tailing logs in CI or just running
> suites locally, you can start to look at failures straight away without
> needing to halt a long suite using --fail-fast or similar.
>
> [ 10] Doggo examples
>
> [01/10] outer passes
>
> [02/10] FAILED (1) - outer fails
>
>
> 1) Doggo examples outer fails
>
> Failure/Error: expect(true).to eql(false)
>
>
>
> expected: false
>
> got: true
>
>
>
> (compared using eql?)
>
>
>
> Diff:
>
> @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
>
> -false
>
> +true
>
>
>
> # ./spec/example/doggo_spec.rb:29:in `block (2 levels) in <top
> (required)>'
>
>
> [03/10] PENDING - outer is pending with xit
>
> [04/10] FAILED (2) - outer is pending with a custom message
>
>
> 2) Doggo examples outer is pending with a custom message FIXED
>
> Expected pending 'custom message' to fail. No error was raised.
>
> # ./spec/example/doggo_spec.rb:35
>
>
> [ 10] in a context
>
> [ 10] with a nested context
>
> [05/10] passes
>
> [06/10] FAILED (3) - fails
>
>
> 3) Doggo examples in a context with a nested context fails
>
> Failure/Error: expect(true).to eql(false)
>
>
>
> expected: false
>
> got: true
>
>
>
> (compared using eql?)
>
>
>
> Diff:
>
> @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
>
> -false
>
> +true
>
>
>
> # ./spec/example/doggo_spec.rb:12:in `block (4 levels) in <top
> (required)>'
>
>
> [07/10] PENDING - is pending with xit
>
> [08/10] FAILED (4) - is pending with a custom message
>
>
> 4) Doggo examples in a context with a nested context is pending with a
> custom message FIXED
>
> Expected pending 'custom message' to fail. No error was raised.
>
> # ./spec/example/doggo_spec.rb:18
>
>
> [ 10] test count
>
> [09/10] is taken to 9
>
> [10/10] is taken to 10, showing leading zero pad formatting
>
>
> Hope someone else finds this useful :-)
>
> --
> Andrew Hodgkinson
> Senior Developer | API Specialist
>
> W: ripglobal.com
> A: Level 2, 40 Taranaki Street, Wellington 6011
> NZBN: 9429030851955
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "rspec" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rspec/81773a67-34a5-4dfb-95cb-aee9a51f727c%40googlegroups.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rspec/81773a67-34a5-4dfb-95cb-aee9a51f727c%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"rspec" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rspec/CAPmDx0OmhUz5HmfeADR6QECZs4uJo7VLT2j5O6Fc-kt7cq6A7Q%40mail.gmail.com.
