Jack,

> So I have a feeling that this will come back to bite me at some point in
the future.

Let's see. I wouldn't trust Rails 5.0 deprecations that much, if I recall
it correctly, things kept changing back and forth until stabilized in 5.2.

On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 11:48 PM Jack Royal-Gordon <[email protected]> wrote:

> Good question. I’m using the “describe” syntax along
> with config.infer_spec_type_from_file_location!, so the RSpec DSL
> determines the class. From the backtrace, I can see that it’s coming from
> ActionDispatch::IntegrationTest.
>
> I moved forward to RSpec 3.9 (from 3.1), and this problem has changed.
> Now, instead of complaining about positional arguments, I’m getting
>
> undefined method `edit_account_activation' for
> #<RSpec::ExampleGroups::AccountActivationsController::GETEdit:0x00007fb0345841c0>
>
> In other words, it’s not allowing URL helpers at all. So this resolves
> things for me (as far as controllers are concerned) — I’ll use the  get
> ‘action’, params: {…} syntax.
>
> However, I’m seeing the same error in request specs now. That is, “get 
> edit_account_activation(value)”
> gives the error
>
> DEPRECATION WARNING: Using positional arguments in integration tests has
> been deprecated,  favor of keyword arguments, and will be removed in Rails
> 5.1.
>
>
> I discovered that If I add an empty params hash to the request then the
> error goes away, (e.g. "get
> edit_account_activation_path(@user.activation_token)*, params: {}*”).
>
>
> This feels like I’ve found a work-around for an issue that should not
> exist. So I have a feeling that this will come back to bite me at some
> point in the future.
>
>
> On Nov 30, 2020, at 10:53 AM, [email protected] <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> That doesn't seem to be entirely correct.
>
> Rails 5 does
> https://github.com/rails/rails/blob/5-0-stable/railties/lib/rails/generators/test_unit/controller/templates/functional_test.rb#L4
> generate a test that uses `ActionDispatch::IntegrationTest`, but it depends
> on what your test inherits from.
> Do you inherit yours from `ActionDispatch::IntegrationTest` or
> `ActionController::TestCase`?
>
> `ActionController::TestCase` code is still in Rails 5.0
> https://github.com/rails/rails/blob/5-0-stable/actionpack/lib/action_controller/test_case.rb#L388
> and Rails 5.2
> https://github.com/rails/rails/blob/5-2-stable/actionpack/lib/action_controller/test_case.rb#L394
> and even Rails 6.0
> https://github.com/rails/rails/blob/6-0-stable/actionpack/lib/action_controller/test_case.rb#L394
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "rspec" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rspec/806a8626-4568-4ce8-86ed-2260e2ebbfedn%40googlegroups.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rspec/806a8626-4568-4ce8-86ed-2260e2ebbfedn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "rspec" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rspec/437B754E-2CE9-4E72-86E5-4F4B0FA7B253%40pobox.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rspec/437B754E-2CE9-4E72-86E5-4F4B0FA7B253%40pobox.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"rspec" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rspec/CAAk5Ok-BWVwhcV%3DD_aSDLy9Q%2BKF5WkUY7wfC247OO5HrVxqnAw%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to