“subscription_cancelled_at merely retrieves an object (which I’m mocking in the 
“build_deep_struct” call, which is just a beefed up Struct class generator). No 
calcs are being done, no calls to get time (other than the two “let!” 
statements), no time math. It’s just building an object that is a struct (in 
the case of #build_deep_struct) and pulling out properties of the object (in 
the case of #subscription_canceled_at). I do use TimeCop when I’m doing match 
or testing code that retrieves date/time values, but this is not one of those 
cases.  We’re literally doing the following:

let (:time_value) { 2.weeks.ago }

…

some_strucuture.some_property = time_value

…

expect(some_strucuture.some_property).to eq time_value


Of course, there is some code in between to make it less obvious, but that’s 
fundamentally what’s going on.

> On Feb 25, 2021, at 12:21 PM, Joseph Haig <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> I don't know exactly what is going on in your `subscription_cancelled_at` 
> method but generally if you are trying to run tests with time involved you 
> want to use something like Timecop (https://github.com/travisjeffery/timecop 
> <https://github.com/travisjeffery/timecop>) or, if you are using Rails, the 
> Rails time helpers 
> (https://api.rubyonrails.org/v6.1.3/classes/ActiveSupport/Testing/TimeHelpers.html
>  
> <https://api.rubyonrails.org/v6.1.3/classes/ActiveSupport/Testing/TimeHelpers.html>).
>  This will allow you to change the time at will and to freeze time so that 
> you do not see small differences that are most likely due to the time it 
> takes to run your code.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Joe
> 
> On Thu, 25 Feb 2021 at 18:58, Jack Royal-Gordon <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> I have the following examples:
> 
>   describe "#subscription_cancelled_at" do
>     let!(:user) { FactoryBot.create(:user, stripe_id: 'stripe') }
>     let!(:stripe_customer) { Stripe::Customer.new }
>     let!(:past_date) { 2.weeks.ago }
>     let!(:future_date) { 2.weeks.from_now }
>     let!(:subscription) { build_deep_struct(status: 'active', 
> cancel_at_period_end: false, canceled_at: nil, current_period_end: 
> future_date) }
> 
>     it 'returns nil if there is no subscription' do
>       allow(user).to receive(:stripe_customer).and_return(nil)
>       expect(user).to receive(:stripe_customer)
>       expect(stripe_customer).to_not receive(:subscriptions)
>       expect(user.subscription_cancelled_at).to be_nil
>     end
>     
>     it "returns canceled_at if it is populated" do
>       subscription.canceled_at = past_date
>       allow(user).to receive(:stripe_customer).and_return(stripe_customer)
>       allow(stripe_customer).to 
> receive(:subscriptions).and_return([subscription])
>       expect(user).to receive(:stripe_customer)
>       expect(stripe_customer).to receive(:subscriptions)
>       expect(user.subscription_cancelled_at.utc).to eq past_date
>     end
>     
>     it "returns current_period_end if subscription will cancel at period end" 
> do
>       subscription.cancel_at_period_end = true
>       allow(user).to receive(:stripe_customer).and_return(stripe_customer)
>       allow(stripe_customer).to 
> receive(:subscriptions).and_return([subscription])
>       expect(user).to receive(:stripe_customer)
>       expect(stripe_customer).to receive(:subscriptions)
>       expect(user.subscription_cancelled_at).to eq future_date
>     end
>     
>     it 'returns false otherwise' do
>       allow(user).to receive(:stripe_customer).and_return(stripe_customer)
>       allow(stripe_customer).to 
> receive(:subscriptions).and_return([subscription])
>       expect(user).to receive(:stripe_customer)
>       expect(stripe_customer).to receive(:subscriptions)
>       expect(user.subscription_cancelled_at).to be_nil
>     end
>   end
> 
> All that’s really going on here is that I’m passing the dates through some 
> data structures and eventually returning the expected dates. There is no date 
> math (or conversion) involved behind the scenes. However, I get these results:
> 
>   1) User::StripeCustomer#subscription_cancelled_at returns canceled_at if it 
> is populated
>      Failure/Error: expect(user.subscription_cancelled_at.utc).to eq 
> @@past_date
>      
>        expected: 2021-02-11 18:48:06.455547000 +0000
>             got: 2021-02-11 18:48:06.455546855 +0000
>      
>        (compared using ==)
>      
>        Diff:
>        @@ -1 +1 @@
>        -Thu, 11 Feb 2021 18:48:06 UTC +00:00
>        +2021-02-11 18:48:06 UTC
>        
>      # ./spec/models/user/stripe_customer_spec.rb:312:in `block (3 levels) in 
> <top (required)>'
> 
>   2) User::StripeCustomer#subscription_cancelled_at returns 
> current_period_end if subscription will cancel at period end
>      Failure/Error: expect(user.subscription_cancelled_at).to eq @@future_date
>      
>        expected: 2021-03-11 18:48:06.455753000 +0000
>             got: 2021-03-11 10:48:06.455752849 -0800
>      
>        (compared using ==)
>      
>        Diff:
>        @@ -1 +1 @@
>        -Thu, 11 Mar 2021 18:48:06 UTC +00:00
>        +2021-03-11 10:48:06 -0800
>        
>      # ./spec/models/user/stripe_customer_spec.rb:321:in `block (3 levels) in 
> <top (required)>'
> 
> 
> Notice that the times being compared are off by very small amounts (< 1 sec). 
> I tried replacing the “let!” commands with assignments to class variables 
> (@@past_date, etc) in an attempt to ensure that the let! blocks were not 
> being re-evaluated each time they were referenced, but that was not the case.
> 
> I can certainly change the test to check for a time “close” to the expected 
> time, but that is a hack. Can anyone explain why I’m getting these 
> differences?
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "rspec" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rspec/E9584261-2BFC-49BB-AC53-21991545F39F%40pobox.com
>  
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rspec/E9584261-2BFC-49BB-AC53-21991545F39F%40pobox.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "rspec" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rspec/CAKRXwc2D%2B8kagXdvf_2_RS%2BrYnJg9Z1pCgaOR%2B-d_8xB37S4XQ%40mail.gmail.com
>  
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rspec/CAKRXwc2D%2B8kagXdvf_2_RS%2BrYnJg9Z1pCgaOR%2B-d_8xB37S4XQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"rspec" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rspec/CB2DB839-4EB2-464C-AE19-D5E8C1E5D11B%40pobox.com.

Reply via email to