-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 3:24 AM, Derek Martin <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi, > He won't. ;-) Ok, it's up to you :-) > Everyone thinks supporting their particular need is > useful... That's a bit exaggerated: I don't think svn is a "my particular need"; We are talking about a widely used program. > If I added a patch to rssh for everything that anyone > thought was useful, rssh would be bash. =8^) I see but why supporting rdist, cvs and rsync is ok while supporting svn will make rssh like bash? Please don't misunderstand my words; I'm not pointing the finger of blame at you, I just want to understand the problem. Thanks, davide -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFJy0hn4GIY1C5CdcURAvIDAJ97X7lAbg6GnSmIUTMRo8cUjrC2tACgv5WW I6iL/wYx2DIlNgs/UXXw5gU= =5LHn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ rssh-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rssh-discuss
