On Jun 4, 2025, at 00:24, Eliot Lear <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Authors may include multiple versions of images or diagrams in rfcxml. >> Publication formats should present the version that is best suited to each >> format. In many cases, that will be an SVG. > > Does this cover the case where the responsive interface would indicate a dark > mode version of an SVG?
Is there is anything in any of the current RFCs that would cover that? I don't think so, but I could be wrong. If there isn't, then this SVG-specific document is certainly the wrong place to introduce it. --Paul Hoffman -- rswg mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
