Hi, Okay, new draft is available at: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-editorial-rswg-svgsinrfcs/
Here's the diff for review: https://author-tools.ietf.org/diff?doc_1=draft-editorial-rswg-svgsinrfcs-02&doc_2=draft-editorial-rswg-svgsinrfcs-03 Thanks, Alexis On Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 2:38 PM Pete Resnick <[email protected]> wrote: > Assuming no other last minute screams, let's go with that wording. > Alexis, if you can publish a new rev, I'll toss it over the wall to the > RSAB. > > pr > > On 12 Jun 2025, at 21:16, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > > > Works for me. > > > > Regards > > Brian Carpenter > > > > On 13-Jun-25 07:59, Eliot Lear wrote: > >> I'm good with all of what Martin wrote, but with one slight suggested > >> change: > >> > >> On 12.06.2025 17:25, Martin Thomson wrote: > >>> SVGs must not include animation or interactive features. > >>> SVGs should include only limited reactive design elements (scaling, > >>> dark/light mode, and perhaps minor adjustments to allow for > >>> variations in display technology). The intent being to ensure that > >>> how something is displayed does not substantially alter what is > >>> seen. > >> > >> Since this is intent, my suggestion is that we go a little higher > >> level and say "... alter the diagram's meaning", and drop the word > >> "substantially". > >> > >> Eliot > >> > >> > > > -- > Pete Resnick https://www.episteme.net/ > All connections to the world are tenuous at best >
-- rswg mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
