On Wed, Oct 15, 2025 at 1:11 PM Brian E Carpenter < [email protected]> wrote:
> I believe this is ready. > > One possible tweak. The Introduction says: > > "The RFC Publication Center (RPC) is responsible for implementing the > policies in this document, as described in [RFC9720]." > > Maybe add something like: > > "In case of ambiguity in these policies, the RPC will apply its best > judgment rather than delay publication." > > That seems to be what people having been saying in recent messages. > I think 9280 already covers this in section 4.4 though [1] where the RPC can consult the stream for stream-related issues or RSAB for cross-stream issues? [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc9280#name-resolution-of-disagreements > > Regards > Brian Carpenter > > On 16-Oct-25 03:39, Pete Resnick wrote: > > Apparently I am inept with the datatracker, so this message serves as > > the start of a 2-week WGLC for draft-rswg-rfc7997bis-05. Find the > > document here: > > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rswg-rfc7997bis/ > > > > We've already had a few comments on the list. At the conclusion of the > > WGLC, I'll have Paul roll a -06 covering those comments and, if all > > looks good, I can toss it over the wall to the RSAB. > > > > pr > > > > -- > rswg mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] >
-- rswg mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
