IMO this discussion shows that we probably should not attempt to deal with
tricky I18N issues in an RSWG document. The less we say beyond "provide a
Latin script alternative" the better.
(via tiny screen & keyboard)
Regards,
Brian Carpenter
On Tue, 4 Nov 2025, 12:27 Paul Hoffman, <[email protected]> wrote:
> [author's hat on]
>
> Is this discussion about some suggested text for the draft that I missed?
> If not, is it leading towards suggested text for which there might be rough
> consensus? All I'm seeing are examples of things that the RPC has seen and
> might see in the future, but I could have missed the suggested text for the
> draft.
>
> I don't want to curtail the discussion, but this is a WG with a draft that
> is supposed to move forward, and I'm on the hook for that movement.
>
> --Paul Hoffman
>
> --
> rswg mailing list -- [email protected]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
>
--
rswg mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
