Hi all,
On 12/22/25 1:33 PM, Jay Daley wrote:
On 23 Dec 2025, at 08:07, Eric Rescorla <[email protected]> wrote:
On Mon, Dec 22, 2025 at 11:06 AM Jay Daley <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
The response to this low turnout has been the widespread
dissemination of the notes by email so that at least they reach
hundreds even if not everyone reads them. This has resulted in
some feedback, largely around the information provided and how
that might be used.
The question then is how to achieve 3) and this is a similar
question being asked for tools development. Should the RPC public
meetings be refocused on strategic priorities only? Is an online
plan/roadmap needed that people can comment on?
Not Eliot, but yes and yes.
Jean Mahoney of the RPC maintains this: https://github.com/orgs/rfc-
editor/projects/2 <https://github.com/orgs/rfc-editor/
projects/2> (though I don’t know what mechanism is preferred for
feedback on that) and references it in the notes she sends out.
[JM] Please send feedback on the RPC roadmap to the rfc-interest list.
Best regards,
Jean
Jay
-Ekr
--
rswg mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
--
Jay Daley
IETF Executive Director
[email protected]
--
rswg mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
