Since we are sharing anecdata, RFC 9348 generally looks pretty good in text form.
But not uniformly. Glyph availability in monospace fonts means that some Figures (Figure 11 in particular) looks terrible on my machine. This is because the default monospace font on Windows lacks glyphs for a bunch of the characters the conversion used. That is consistent across several apps, bar one [1]. I don't know if that is really actionable, but it highlights the need for more than a superficial treatment. On the other hand, mature tools for math (of which MathML is now one, a somewhat recent development) have worked out a lot of these knots. [1] Interestingly, it looks fine -- sort of -- in a Chromium browser because the glyph is scaled up That leads to some truly epic vertical height on the parentheses. On Thu, Jan 29, 2026, at 07:31, Carsten Bormann wrote: > Looked great in the mail client. > Trying again... > > On 2026-01-28, at 21:29, Carsten Bormann <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> TXT rendering: >> ┌───────────────┐ >> │ α * (1 + β) >> AVG_AIMD(α, β) = ╲ │─────────────── >> ╲│2 * (1 - β) * p > > Grüße, Carsten > > -- > rswg mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] -- rswg mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
