On May 14, 6:26am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Max Bowsher) wrote: -- Subject: rsync digest, Vol 1 #717 - 12 msgs > > + After thinking about it a bit more I'm somewhat inclined to call it a > + bug in Cygwin and try to get them to fix it. > > Well, you could, but I'd much prefer it if you didn't :-) > I guess its time for you to make an executive descision - Is it reasonable > to include code in rsync to close sockets, even though exit() does it anyway > on most platforms. I would argue that a few close_socket() calls woudn't > cause any clutter - but then my interest is obviously focused on cygwin. > -- End of excerpt from Max Bowsher
Are you all aware of the work done by Jonathan Kamens last July? See bug 3236 ... http://rsync.samba.org/cgi-bin/rsync/incoming?id=3236 Sorry if this has already been discussed: I am joining the thread late. Bob Byrnes e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Curl Corporation phone: 617-761-1200 400 Technology Square, 8th Floor fax: 617-761-1201 Cambridge, MA 02139 -- To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
