On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 11:09:32PM -0500, Buck Huppmann wrote: > yes, my bad. sorry. before i throw out more babies with the bathwater, > though, anybody know if any other systems besides HP-UX and Solaris > (for default ACLs, at least) require a MASK/CLASS_OBJ when there are > no non-USER_OBJ/GROUP_OBJ/OTHER entries? > > thanks, Eric C., for finding this out
to wind this up, for anybody who cares, the latest, greatest versions of this patch are up at http://www.lpmd.org/rsync/ (thanks to John C. again for hosting) for 2.5.5 and 2.5.6. use at your own risk, but let me know if you find bugs (so i can mitigate my own risk) on the matter of which platforms require masks/CLASS_OBJs, i gave the samba sysacls.c a quick once over and discerned that, at least for the mappings as implemented therein, HP-UX, Unixware and Solaris re- quire CLASS_OBJs, which the new code synthesizes by or-ing all group and named-user ACEs, as you might expect, in the absence of a source mask/CLASS_OBJ entry -- To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
