On 12 Jun 2003, Brad Hards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hash: SHA1 > > On Wed, 11 Jun 2003 11:25 am, Martin Pool wrote: > > That could be a pretty nice thing. We use little rsync shares on > > workstations here for sharing files, and I know some people do the > > same with FTP. > > > > What aside from SLP would make this more useful?
> A standardised way of describing the share would be good. By this, I don't > mean a software implementation, but a user / admin configuration. Think > Standard Operating Procedures. > The other thing that would be nice would be a search capability - "find me the > shares with a copy of rsync-2.5.6.tar.bz2" OK, interesting. > 1. I'm thinking about something that, as a minimum, doesn't do plain text > passwords. I admire clever attacks as much as the next guy, but the next guy > doesn't want some kewl hax0r with a copy of tcpdump uploading warez either. > Probably SASL is worth a look. Yes, SASL looks like the way to go, at least for authentication. Some things I read indicate that SASL is not a good choice for encryption/integrity. So perhaps we should use SASL just for authentication, and SSL for confidentiality/integrity. Does that make any sense? > Why run this _only_ over TCP? Obviously you don't want to re-invent TCP/IP > error handling, but the protocol shouldn't rely on such a system. File > transfer can potentially run connectionless. It sounds like you're talking about something like NFS (XDR-RPC) that can run over UDP or TCP? I wouldn't rely on TCP specifically, but I think it's OK to rely on a byte stream channel, such as TCP or SSH. I suppose if you're going to do UDP then you might want to try to do multicast too, but that makes things like error handling a lot harder. But I do think there should be a layer at which there are distinct messages, and that what goes under that might be something other than a byte stream in future. -- Martin -- To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html