On Mon, 2004-02-02 at 14:51, jw schultz wrote: > On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 02:01:15PM -0800, Clint Byrum wrote: > > Hi everyone. Has anyone experienced rsync 2.6.0 causing huge amounts of > > system load? Especially on Linux 2.4?
<snip> > There aren't too many things that would account for this. > The only one i can think of is an exclude pattern that > causes pathalogical behavior with the new pattern matching > code. 2.6.0 also defaults to ssh and if you have ssh doing > compression by default that could affect it. > You don't show your command-line so nothing else comes to > mind. > rsync -Wa --exclude=*tmp* --exclude=SYSLOCKS* --delete --delete-after /localsource $box::dest/dir That looks like pretty normal exclude stuff to me. I'm copying the entire dataset over to a throw-away box to test the idea, since I would imagine part of the problem would be the file list itself. That will take me a while though. > > > > Oh, and one other thing... whats up with this: > > > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1294978 Jan 30 12:54 > > /usr/local/rsync-2.6.0/bin/rsync > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 216785 Dec 3 20:42 /usr/bin/rsync > > > > Has rsync really added 5 times as many features? More error checking? > > Just curious really. They're both stripped binaries in case thats what > > you were thinking. ;) > > Most likely differences in the build options and environment. > DOH! I dunno why I thought it was stripped. :-P How embarassing... -rwxr-xr-x 1 clint ccast 177664 Feb 2 17:33 rsync.stripped Thats my 2.6.0 binary stripped. Its smaller now! :-P -- To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
