On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 02:31:10PM +0100, Dick Streefland wrote: > I think that including a symlinked file (or directory) is slightly > less confusing than skipping the symlinks. The man page description of > the --one-file-system option talks about crossing filesystem boundaries > when recursing, and following one symlink is not recursing. Also, > "cp -rxL" behaves like this.
I too am inclined to think that a change in behavior is needed. Your comment on how cp behaves further reinforces this, so unless someone has a good reason why this should remain the same, I'll check in a change. > BTW: Your message contained a "Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]", but I only > received it directly from you, not via de mailing list. I got it via the mailing list, so I don't know why you didn't. Perhaps you have a filter that eliminates duplicates (based on Message-ID)? ..wayne.. -- To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
