On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 01:54:20AM -0600, John Van Essen wrote: > (Note to Wayne - isn't it dangerous to assume that off_t is 64 bits?
Yeah, it probably is -- that code was always a kluge that doesn't really get used. I looked around at the rest of the rsync code, and it looks to me like the various uses of uint64 could each be replaced by int64. > If HAVE_LONGLONG is 0, look in config.log for long long to see why > the test for it failed. Does your cross compiler really not have it? The root problem is that rsync's configure script uses AC_TRY_RUN in bogus ways -- i.e. it totally punts a lot of checks when it is cross- compiling, so it doesn't even check if "long long" works. It looks like configure.in is really in need of a bunch of cleanup in that regard. In the meantime, anyone cross-compiling would do well to look at all the AC_TRY_RUN checks in configure.in in order to figure out which defines didn't get properly checked, and then manually edit config.h to set them to their proper values. ..wayne.. -- To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
