On Sat, Feb 12, 2005 at 10:07:05PM -0500, John E. Malmberg wrote:
Rsync is not including this file, nor is there a feature test for this header file in the configure phase, but rsync is using [int64 and
uint64].
Rsync is defining its own int64 (using a define, not a typedef), so it is not depending on these fairly new types being found on the system (also, I thought they were really int64_t and uint64_t, but I could be wrong).
That is what the standard types are.
That define int int32 did not happen on my system for reasons that I have not yet determined. I discovered it when the compile failed.
They do not seem to be "new" types, but common older non-standard types.
It would probably be a good idea to add a test to configure to look for int64_t and make use of it, if necessary (with an appropriate include of inttypes.h or stdint.h, which configure already checks for, but rsync.h doesn't currently use). The latest code no longer uses uint64.
int8, int16, int32, int64, etc... on my system are in the header file ints.h.
As near as I can determine from google:
For BEOS those definitions are in support/SupportDefs.h
For HP-UX those definitions are in model.h
Linux also seems to have ints.h. At the present time, I do not have quick access to inspect the contents.
-John [EMAIL PROTECTED] Personal Opinion Only
-- To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
