On Thu 01 Sep 2005, Xuehai Zhang wrote: > > > > If (similar) tasks are run in parallel, then the data of the files being > > handled may still be in the buffer cache so that it doesn't need to get > > read in from disk again. This will save time... > > I agree with you that caching effect might be the cause. The buffer cache > you mentioned refers to the cache on the data source, right?
Yes. Paul Slootman -- To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
