Hi Tony,
> rsync -aI --stats --copy-links
--temp-dir=/tmp/ --timeout=55 srcIp::srcPath/srcFile
destPath/destFile
> I
think I'd try it WITHOUT the
> l
of -al
>
--copy-links
>
--temp-dir=/tmp/
May i know why is it you would try it without "a"
option in "aI". What difference would it make ?
> I
don't see how they'd do anything useful if copying just ONE
file
>
It's just possible you're sending something off on a wild-goose
chase.
Actually, in this
context RSYNC is used to update a redundant Network Box with the actual
one. Rsync in this context
syncs the
configuration files required by the redundant box which are used on a High
Availbility System. So just one file would solve this
purpose.
>
55 seconds is a long time to move something reasonably
small.
>
When it does work, how long does it take?
We'll
ya i agree 55 is a long time for such a small file.But it still fails sometimes.
The actual time taken while done successfully
is
nearly 1min 45seconds. These files are actually read
and written to flash. That's why it takes so long. The processor used on the
network boxes are IXP425. Hope this information can
hint you to give me some more
options. |
-- To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html