On Tue, 7 Feb 2006, Wayne Davison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 02:32:22PM -0500, Daniel Rawson wrote:
>> I am indeed using --dry-run (well, -n, but ...). That must be it!
>
> I'm changing this for 2.6.7, as I want the output of -n to be closer
> to what rsync would output when -n is removed.
Good idea. I always wondered why verbose was forced on for --dry-run
(although I must admit I'll be using -v most of the time anyway...).
But still - consistency is important.
John
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
