On Tue 06 Nov 2007, Matt McCutchen wrote: > > > Or maybe > > just have it report a speedup of 1.00 instead? Still misleading, but > > it preserves the output format and is trivial to write (but still, > > alas, confusing for the user, so this doesn't fill me with glee). > > That lie would be no improvement over the current one.
A speedup of 0 would be appropriate somehow :-) Paul Slootman -- To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
