On Thu 21 Feb 4:59 2008 Matt McCutchen wrote: > On Wed, 2008-02-20 at 16:06 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > while anything is possible, i highly doubt it. emerge-webrsync > > basically > > unpacks a tarball and then uses rsync to copy that src tree to the dest > > tree /usr/portage. > [...] > > tar jxf snapshot-xxxxxxxx.tar.bz2 > > cd snapshot-xxxxxxxx > > rsync -av --progress --stats --delete --delete-after \ > > --exclude='/distfiles' --exclude='/packages' --exclude='/local' \ > > . /usr/portage > > Mike, I don't share your apparent assumption that emerge-webrsync is > intrinsically less buggy than rsync. In any case, I can only answer for > the behavior of rsync itself, so I need to know the actual rsync command > line. The one you gave isn't consistent with the error message, in > which the absolute path of the missing file doesn't have a component of > the form "snapshot-xxxxxxxx". > > elai, perhaps you could find out the actual command line by writing an > rsync wrapper script that prints out its arguments and getting > emerge-webrsync to call that script instead of the real rsync > executable. Printing out rsync's working directory might also be > helpful. > > Matt >
I will try, I'll post any finding that I'll find, like I said, you've mentioned faulty fs which I've checked and it ass ok, now what about the kernel angle, I did heard of someone that had an issue with rsync and fixed it by recompiling its kernel, the question is, does it a compilation related or version of kernel related. I'll try an boot with my other kernel image and run rsync again, I'll post my findings too. -- To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
