Matt, Thanks. I have noticed the performance degradation issue in rsync V2 when file count reaches some limit. but I think it wont be there in rsync V3(Assume that directory counts are not much smaller than file counts). Correct?
Thanks, Jignesh On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 12:31 AM, Matt McCutchen <m...@mattmccutchen.net>wrote: > On Tue, 2008-12-23 at 20:21 +0530, Jignesh Shah wrote: > > Is there any limit in total files to be transfered in rsync V3.0.4? > > There's no hard-coded limit, but memory is still a constraint... > > > The rsync V3.0.4 has synching interleaved with file system walk and > > thus it uses much less memory so ideally it should not have any limit > > of total number of files to be transfered. Am I right? > > No, it still holds a list of all directories (called "dir_flist") in > memory, so you may still hit a limit on the number of directories. See: > > http://lists.samba.org/archive/rsync/2007-August/018193.html > > -- > Matt > >
-- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html